In reply to:
Glenn Little
@GlennLittle5
·
65d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
65d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with the public issue of immigration policy, a significant societal concern. The tone is informative and aims to redirect the conversation towards a detailed policy statement on immigration justice.
- The statement does no harm with words and actions, as it simply provides a link to a policy statement without inflammatory language or personal attacks. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, avoiding cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By redirecting to a policy statement that presumably promotes care and respect for immigrants, the statement aligns with promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, instead providing a constructive resource for further dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to potentially better society by encouraging informed discussion on immigration policy. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform responsibly by sharing a relevant policy link. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.