Marianne Williamson

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 237
7/21/2024, 1:50:50 PM
X
In reply to:
Crossfire Hurricane
@pressp_photo
·
64d
@nancyladish2 @marwilliamson @ninaturner lol. She’s a joke.
nancyladish
@nancyladish2
·
64d
@marwilliamson @ninaturner @pressp_photo Marianne Williamson is a FEC registered candidate who was the first to declare her candidacy and received a half million primary votes. She has definitely earned a spot at the convention!
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
64d
@ninaturner @pressp_photo Right now the DNC Rules and Bylaws committee has designed the process in such a way that if there is to be an open convention, any proposed candidate would need 300-600 signed nominations from party delegates (no more than 50 from one state) in order for that candidate to be…
Nina Turner
@ninaturner
·
64d
@pressp_photo Reflection is necessary. Democrats should really rethink the primary process moving forward to ensure it’s democratic
Crossfire Hurricane
@pressp_photo
·
64d
@ninaturner Woulda, coulda, shoulda isn’t the least bit helpful. Deal with WHAT IS!
Nina Turner
@ninaturner
·
64d
This is correct and we should be honest about it.

Had Biden been on a debate stage with Rep. Dean Phillips and Marianne Williamson, Democrats would not be in this position today.

The statement in question constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the qualifications and criticisms of a political candidate, Marianne Williamson. The tone is confrontational and accusatory, aiming to discredit the candidate by listing various allegations. The intent appears to be to challenge the legitimacy of the candidate's qualifications and actions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm; it lists several negative allegations without providing evidence, which could harm the candidate's reputation. (-2 points) [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of the candidate and could be seen as a form of cyberbullying or harassment. (-2 points) [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses a confrontational tone and makes personal attacks. (-2 points) [-2]