Reposted by Ilhan Omar
The statement references a public figure's comments on political leadership and governance, which are substantive issues relevant to public discourse. The tone appears to be neutral, simply relaying information about what was said at a rally without endorsing or condemning the content.
- The statement itself does not directly cause harm, but it relays potentially harmful rhetoric that could be interpreted as endorsing authoritarianism, which could indirectly cause harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it merely reports a controversial opinion without context or critique. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it simply relays a controversial opinion without analysis or counterpoint. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use influence for the betterment of society; it could be seen as amplifying a potentially harmful viewpoint without critique. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by reporting on a public figure's comments, but it does not use the platform responsibly by failing to provide context or critique. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.