In reply to:
Christina B
@ChristinaBehme4
·
350d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
350d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a political debate about the actions and integrity of public figures, specifically related to the 2020 election and the behavior of former President Trump.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it implies dishonesty and could be seen as inflammatory, thus violating this principle. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others and could be interpreted as engaging in a form of cyberbullying or harassment by accusing someone of lying. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and dismissive. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to a personal attack on Trump rather than addressing the issue constructively. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not uphold the principles of free speech responsibly; it uses the platform to make a potentially harmful accusation without constructive intent. [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.