The statement discusses the qualities of effective leadership, specifically contrasting the best leaders with the worst leaders based on their ability to prioritize collective interests over personal ambitions. This is a substantive engagement with a public issue, namely leadership qualities, and thus constitutes public discourse.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a general observation about leadership qualities without targeting any specific individual or group.
[+1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the importance of selflessness in leadership. It encourages empathy and compassion by suggesting that good leaders prioritize the collective good.
[+2]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is a general critique of leadership qualities without targeting specific individuals.
[+1]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.By discussing the qualities of good and bad leaders, the statement uses its influence to promote better leadership practices, which can contribute to the betterment of society.
[+2]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by engaging in a constructive discussion about leadership qualities.
[+1]