The statement and the referenced conversation constitute public discourse as they engage with societal issues, specifically gendered abuse and disinformation against women political candidates, and the potential for misleading narratives in political contexts.
- The statement by @GaryMarcus uses strong language ('bullshit') which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the use of strong language could be seen as disrespectful.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on warning against potential misinformation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses a dismissive tone ('bullshit') which could be seen as a personal attack on those who might propagate the misinformation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but could be seen as not using the platform responsibly due to the inflammatory language.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.