Gary Marcus

Rank 28 of 47
|
Score 14
7/21/2024, 10:03:34 PM
X
In reply to:
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
100d
@GaryMarcus she lies about her race and emphasizes being Asian or Black depending on the election. this is a matter of record (as in she’s on video engaging in the above). so I love this because Dems are going to lose.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
100d
Excellent roadmap to the bullshit we can expect ahead.

America, don’t fall for it.
Nina Jankowicz
@wiczipedia
·
100d
In 2020 I led a study on gendered abuse and disinfo against women political candidates. We found 336k pieces of abuse & disinfo targeting 13 candidates; 78% of that targeted Kamala Harris. After Biden’s endorsement, here are some narratives and tropes we should look out for: (1/)

The statement by @olivia_p_walker constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues related to race, identity, and political integrity. The reply to @olivia_p_walker also constitutes public discourse as it addresses these issues and seeks to clarify or challenge the original statement.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by questioning the objection in a neutral manner, without using harmful language. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on the issue rather than attacking the individual. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by asking for clarification and seeking to understand the objection. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by questioning the objection without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]