In reply to:
Dean Phillips
@deanbphillips
·
63d
The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the format and purpose of political debates, specifically in the context of Democratic delegates and potential candidates. It questions the inclusivity and transparency of the proposed debate format, thus contributing to civic dialogue.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a reasoned critique of a proposed debate format. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by questioning the inclusivity of the debate format, encouraging a more open and transparent process. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the issue at hand rather than attacking individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to engage in a meaningful discussion about public issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.