Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement by @DavidSacks and the response to it both engage in public discourse as they address significant public issues, namely the political situation in the United States and the actions of public figures like Joe Biden and Donald Trump. The tone of the response is critical and somewhat personal, focusing on David's financial support for Donald Trump and questioning Trump's mental stability.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it is accusatory and could be seen as harmful to both David and Donald Trump. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it engages in a personal attack on both David and Donald Trump. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is critical and dismissive. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- While the statement exercises free speech, it does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it engages in personal attacks rather than substantive debate. [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.