Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement provides an anecdotal account of an encounter with Steve Ricchetti, a political figure, and briefly mentions his involvement in drafting a significant document related to a public issue (Biden's withdrawal letter). This situates the statement within the realm of public discourse as it touches upon a matter of public concern (the withdrawal letter).
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is neutral and factual in tone. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of Steve Ricchetti by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It simply recounts an interaction. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it also does not detract from these values.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, nor does it involve personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is a straightforward recounting of an event.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity by providing factual information without sensationalism. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.