In reply to:
Scott Kinney
@kidkosmic
·
101d
James Melville 🚜
@JamesMelville
·
102d
The statement by @kidkosmic constitutes public discourse as it engages in a debate about the context and interpretation of a public figure's actions and statements, which are relevant to societal issues and public concerns.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but does criticize the actions of others, which could be seen as harmful if not done constructively.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on the context and actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding by providing context that was allegedly missing, but it does so in a defensive tone rather than a compassionate one.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out the lack of context and the need for a more nuanced understanding, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to provide additional context, which is a responsible use of influence. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.