Robert Costa

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 191

The statement and the accompanying image constitute public discourse as they engage in a political endorsement and critique of a public figure, contributing to the civic dialogue around the upcoming presidential election.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to support a political candidate and criticizes another, which is a common practice in political discourse. However, it includes strong language such as 'convicted felon' and 'stokes violence,' which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy of individuals but engages in strong criticism of a public figure, which is a common aspect of political discourse. The language used could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy towards Kamala Harris and her policies but does not extend the same towards Donald Trump, focusing on negative aspects.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue with those in disagreement and instead uses strong language to criticize the opposing candidate. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to influence public opinion in favor of Kamala Harris, which aligns with the principle of using influence for societal betterment from the perspective of the endorsers. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech but could be seen as lacking in responsibility and integrity due to the strong, potentially inflammatory language used.