Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a substantive public issue—governance of AI under different political leaderships. It invites readers to consider the implications of a Harris presidency versus a Trump presidency on AI policy, thus contributing to civic dialogue.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is focused on policy analysis rather than personal attacks. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by providing an analysis of AI governance under different political scenarios. It encourages readers to consider the implications of these policies. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by comparing the AI policies of Harris and Trump. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the author's influence to inform the public about important policy issues, contributing to the betterment of society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a significant public issue. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.