Reposted by Jake Tapper
Josh Kraushaar
@JoshKraushaar
·
389d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the actions and rhetoric of a public figure, Candace Owens, and their implications for societal values and historical understanding. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to highlight and condemn Owens' alleged downplaying of the Holocaust and promotion of antisemitic views.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses strong, accusatory language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others to some extent by focusing on public actions and statements of a public figure, but it borders on harassment by using harsh language. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on condemnation and criticism. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against Candace Owens. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it resorts to inflammatory language. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.