The statement addresses a public issue related to the discourse on AI models, suggesting that the current hype is overshadowing other valuable AI technologies. The tone is critical but constructive, aiming to redirect attention to underappreciated aspects of AI development.
- The statement strives to do no harm and instead aims to broaden the conversation around AI technologies, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By highlighting the need for a more balanced discussion on AI, the statement promotes understanding and empathy for other AI models that may be overlooked. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out a specific issue (the hype) and suggesting a need for more comprehensive attention, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.