In reply to:
angry liddle crab 🇵🇸 🖤
@angryliddlecrab
·
59d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
59d
The statement engages in a discussion about political and economic dynamics, referencing historical contexts to counter a point made by another user. This constitutes public discourse as it addresses societal issues and engages in a debate about political ideologies.
- The statement does not use harmful language and aims to clarify a point, thus adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding by highlighting the importance of historical nuances, which aligns with the principle of promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the argument rather than attacking the individual, thus adhering to the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.