In reply to:
Steven Marlow
@sd_marlow
·
345d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
345d
The statement by @sd_marlow addresses a public issue, specifically the actions and decision-making processes of government officials, which is a matter of public concern. The tone is corrective and aims to clarify a perceived misunderstanding about the nature of the actions taken by the government. The intent is to refute the claim that the actions constitute insider trading and to provide a more accurate characterization of the decision-making process.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It aims to clarify a misunderstanding rather than attack individuals. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying a misconception about government actions. However, it could be more empathetic and compassionate in its tone. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the argument rather than attacking the person. It avoids personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to correct misinformation. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.