Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement by Aviva Siegel addresses a significant public issue, namely the ongoing conflict and the plight of hostages. It calls for a specific action from a public figure, Prime Minister Netanyahu, to prioritize the release of hostages over continuing the war. The tone is urgent and personal, reflecting the emotional weight of the situation.
- The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for the cessation of war, which inherently aims to reduce violence and save lives. This aligns well with the principle. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion by highlighting the human cost of the conflict and the importance of bringing hostages home. This strongly aligns with the principle. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by urging Netanyahu to change his course of action without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. This aligns well with the principle. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By using her platform to advocate for the release of hostages and the cessation of war, Aviva Siegel is using her influence for the betterment of society. This strongly aligns with the principle. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity by addressing a critical public issue in a respectful manner. This aligns well with the principle. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.