The statement addresses the erosion of press freedom in Hong Kong, highlighting the gradual compromises that lead to significant consequences. It links to an article discussing a Wall Street Journal reporter's firing, which adds context and depth to the issue.
- The statement does not use harmful language and aims to raise awareness about a critical issue, thus adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on institutional actions rather than personal attacks. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By highlighting the issue of press freedom, the statement promotes understanding and empathy for those affected by such compromises. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of institutional actions without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for the betterment of society by addressing the importance of press freedom. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses its platform responsibly to discuss a significant public issue. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.