In reply to:
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
59d
The statement and the conversation it is part of engage in public discourse by addressing the transparency and fairness of the Democratic National Committee's (DNC) nomination process. The tone of the statement is neutral and factual, indicating that an amendment has been made to an article, which is relevant to the concerns raised in the conversation.
- The statement does no harm and provides an update on the situation, which is neutral and factual. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in any personal attacks or revealing private information. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing an update that could clarify the situation for those involved. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks and maintains a neutral tone, which is constructive. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement acknowledges a change (amendment) to the article, which aligns with correcting mistakes. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- By providing an update, the statement uses its influence to inform the public, contributing to transparency. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by providing factual information. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.