Rashida Tlaib

Rank 4 of 47
|
Score 365

The statement by @RepRashida constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue, namely the actions of a foreign leader and the response of U.S. lawmakers. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to highlight perceived moral and ethical failings in the actions of her colleagues and the foreign leader in question.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement is accusatory and could be seen as harmful, especially if the claim of genocide is not substantiated. This could incite strong emotions and potentially harm diplomatic relations. (-2 points) [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make a serious accusation that could affect the dignity of the individuals involved. (-1 point) [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; rather, it is confrontational and accusatory. (-2 points) [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is a direct personal attack on both Netanyahu and her colleagues. (-2 points) [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the representative's influence to bring attention to a significant issue, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by holding leaders accountable. (+1 point) [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to some extent, but the accusatory nature and lack of constructive dialogue could be seen as lacking integrity. (0 points)