The Washington Post
@washingtonpost
·
367d
The statement 'It was NOT an apteryx, BC fans!' accompanied by the comic strip and the conversation about the killing of a protected weka bird on a reality TV show does not constitute public discourse. The statement and the comic strip are lighthearted and comical, and they do not substantively engage with the public issue of wildlife protection or the legal and ethical implications of the contestant's actions.
- The statement and comic strip do no harm and are intended to be humorous. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement uses humor to promote understanding and empathy, albeit in a lighthearted manner. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not involve any mistakes that need to be acknowledged or corrected.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses humor, which can be a form of influence, but it does not directly address societal betterment.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses humor responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.