In reply to:
Bill Gurley
@bgurley
·
351d
Tsarathustra
@tsarnick
·
434d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the financial sustainability and technological goals of OpenAI, a significant topic in the tech industry. The tone is dismissive and somewhat mocking, indicated by the use of the laughing emoji and the assertion that LLMs (Large Language Models) will never be worth it. This response touches on several principles, including the promotion of understanding and empathy, constructive criticism, and the responsible use of influence.
- The statement does not strive to do harm directly, but the dismissive tone could be seen as undermining constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it dismisses the value of LLMs without providing a substantive argument. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement lacks constructive criticism and instead opts for a dismissive tone, which does not foster constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use influence for the betterment of society, as it dismisses a significant technological effort without engaging in a meaningful discussion. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.