In reply to:
David Gray Widder
@davidthewid
·
352d
The statement 'thanks, fixed in the online version' is a response to a correction about a possible typo in a previous post. The original post by Gary Marcus discusses the potential issues with OpenAI, comparing it to WeWork and suggesting it may face significant challenges. The conversation involves a critique of OpenAI's business model and technological progress, which is a substantive engagement with public issues related to technology and business.
- The statement does no harm and is a polite acknowledgment of a correction, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it is a neutral and professional response. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by acknowledging and correcting a mistake, which fosters clarity and accuracy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the correction without any personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement acknowledges and corrects a mistake, which aligns with the principle of acknowledging and correcting mistakes. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses influence for the betterment of society by ensuring accurate information is shared. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by addressing the correction in a professional manner. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.