In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
421d
The statement and the image together constitute public discourse as they engage with a public issue, specifically the moral and ethical implications of venture capitalists' political endorsements. The tone of the statement is critical and appears to be sarcastic, implying disapproval of the actions of the individuals mentioned.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it is critical and sarcastic, which could be seen as harmful to the individuals mentioned. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it publicly criticizes specific individuals. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is more of a sarcastic remark. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.