Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 56
7/24/2024, 6:45:00 PM
X
In reply to:
Book Bear 🐻
@Four____under
·
421d
@GaryMarcus He's only had one female rival though, Hillary, and she attacked him first, with them going back and forth fairly equally.

Unless I'm missing something, who were these other female rivals of his who he just attacked out of the blue?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
421d
@Four____under this headline reports what i already knew, and just encapsulated it concisely.
Book Bear 🐻
@Four____under
·
421d
@GaryMarcus Do news headlines affect your opinion of people?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
421d
Why would any woman—or any man who cares about women—want this man to be President?

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the behavior of a public figure, specifically former President Donald Trump, and his treatment of female rivals and critics. The tone is critical and accusatory, highlighting specific instances of derogatory language used by Trump. The intent appears to be to criticize and question Trump's suitability for leadership, particularly from the perspective of gender relations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight harmful behavior, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. However, the use of derogatory language in the quote itself could perpetuate harm.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy of individuals by focusing on public actions and statements of a public figure. However, it includes a derogatory term that could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding of the issue of gendered attacks in politics, but it does so in a way that could be seen as inflammatory rather than empathetic or compassionate. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of a public figure, which is a form of constructive dialogue. However, the tone is accusatory and could be perceived as a personal attack. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to address a societal issue, namely the treatment of women in politics, which aligns with the principle of using influence for the betterment of society. [+1]