In reply to:
Haider.
@slow_developer
·
463d
The statement by @slow_developer and the subsequent replies constitute public discourse as they engage in a substantive discussion about the state and future of generative AI technology, which is a significant public issue in the tech community.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a technical critique and does not involve personal attacks or harmful language. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does contribute to a technical discussion which can be seen as promoting understanding within the tech community.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the generative AI technology. It does not involve personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.