In reply to:
Haider.
@slow_developer
·
464d
The statement by @GaryMarcus constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the future of artificial intelligence, a significant public issue. The conversation involves critical analysis and debate about the progress and challenges in AI research, which contributes to the civic dialogue on technological advancements and their societal implications.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a professional critique of the current state of AI research. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by referencing a detailed research paper and engaging in a thoughtful discussion about the challenges in AI. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism and dialogue. It does not involve personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss important issues in AI research. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.