Jill Stien

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -97

The statement and accompanying images constitute public discourse as they engage with significant political issues, specifically U.S. foreign policy, military aid to Israel, and the actions of a foreign leader. The tone is highly critical and accusatory, aiming to mobilize public opinion against the policies and actions it describes.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language ('war criminal,' 'Israeli war machine') that could be seen as inflammatory and potentially harmful, which may not fully align with the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of the individual it criticizes, labeling them a 'war criminal' without a legal basis, which could be seen as a form of harassment. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy for the Palestinian cause but does so in a manner that could incite anger and division rather than compassion and constructive dialogue.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather uses strong accusatory language, which could be seen as a personal attack. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to advocate for a political cause, which can be seen as an attempt to influence public opinion and policy for what the author believes is the betterment of society. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or constructive, given its accusatory and inflammatory tone. [-1]