Jill Stien

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -97

The statement expresses support for a public figure's call to action regarding a controversial political issue, specifically the arrest of a foreign leader, and references a news event and a public demonstration. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue and contributes to civic dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly incite violence or harm, but the hashtag #ArrestNetanyahu could be seen as provocative and potentially harmful, depending on the context and interpretation. Minor violation. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech directly, but the call for arrest could be seen as disrespectful to the dignity of the individual mentioned. Minor violation. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more aligned with a call to action against an individual. Violation. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is a direct call for arrest without providing context or engaging in a reasoned argument. Violation. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it calls for the arrest of a public figure without context or justification. Violation. [-2]