The statement 'I was there. It was disgusting.' in response to a tweet about Netanyahu’s standing ovation in Congress constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue and expresses a strong opinion on a political event.
- The statement uses strong language ('disgusting') which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and does not violate the privacy and dignity of others.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is a strong expression of disapproval without providing context or reasoning. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is a personal expression of disgust without engaging in a meaningful discussion or providing constructive feedback. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it lacks constructive elements and context. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.