Gary Marcus

The statement 'They aren’t physical *laws*. They are empirical generalizations that are already losing momentum.' is part of a broader conversation about the scientific validity and momentum of AI scaling laws. The tone is assertive and aims to clarify a misconception about the nature of these laws. The intent is to contribute to a debate on the scientific principles underlying AI technology.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a factual correction rather than a personal attack. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement aims to promote understanding by clarifying a scientific concept, although it could be more empathetic in its delivery. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the content of the argument rather than attacking individuals. [+1]
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to contribute to a scientific debate. [+1]