In reply to:
Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
@AndrewYang
·
345d
The statement and linked blog post by Andrew Yang constitute public discourse as they engage with a public issue, specifically the selection of JD Vance as a vice-presidential nominee by Donald Trump. The statement and blog post contribute to civic dialogue by offering an opinion on a political decision and its potential implications.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It expresses a political opinion without using inflammatory language. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of JD Vance and Donald Trump. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does encourage readers to consider the implications of a political decision.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the choice of JD Vance as a running mate. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a public issue with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.