Reposted by Jake Tapper
Andrew Leyden
@PenguinSix
·
357d
The statement expresses strong disapproval of the actions of the protesters, accusing them of aligning with a terrorist group and causing harm to both Jews and the people they claim to support. The tone is highly critical and accusatory.
- The statement aims to criticize the protesters' actions, which the speaker believes are harmful. However, the language used is harsh and could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing further harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the protesters, as it labels them as aligning with a terrorist group and accuses them of terrorizing Jews. This could be seen as a form of harassment. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it takes a confrontational stance that may deepen divisions. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes strong accusations without offering a path for constructive discussion or resolution. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.