The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the capabilities and limitations of large language models (LLMs) in the context of AI development and their performance in mathematical tasks. The tone is analytical and aims to clarify misconceptions about the nature of 'frontier models' and their achievements.
- The statement strives to do no harm by providing a factual correction and clarification about the nature of the AI system being discussed. It does not engage in any harmful rhetoric. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by explaining the difference between 'frontier models' and the neurosymbolic hybrid system from Google DeepMind. It aims to educate the audience on the nuances of AI capabilities. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing a specific point made by another user (@DrJimFan) without resorting to personal attacks. It focuses on the technical aspects and provides a reasoned argument. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.