In reply to:
Nando de Freitas 🏳️🌈
@NandoDF
·
351d
The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the contributions and impact of different AI organizations, comparing OpenAI with Google DeepMind. It questions the assertion that OpenAI is the most impactful AI organization by highlighting significant achievements from Google DeepMind. The tone is inquisitive and somewhat critical, aiming to provoke a deeper analysis of the contributions of these organizations.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm; it is a critical but respectful inquiry into the contributions of different AI organizations.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by encouraging a more nuanced view of the contributions of various AI organizations. It asks for articulation and evidence, which can lead to a more informed discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism and dialogue. It does not resort to personal attacks but rather focuses on the intellectual and economic contributions of the organizations in question. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.