Gary Marcus

The statement '@SusanGroff1 Staff is the word you seem to have failed to read.' is a part of a larger conversation that involves public figures and issues related to political staff and legal convictions. This context suggests that the statement does constitute public discourse as it engages with public issues and debates.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but its tone is somewhat dismissive and could be seen as condescending.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not show much respect for the dignity of the other person either.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it seems to be more focused on pointing out a perceived mistake. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is more of a personal jab, which could be seen as a minor personal attack. [-1]