Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement by Nikki Haley addresses a public issue concerning the mental competency of elected officials, particularly those in Washington, D.C. It suggests the implementation of mental competency tests for politicians, which is a substantive engagement with a public policy issue.
- The statement does not appear to intend harm; it frames the proposal as a measure to ensure effective governance rather than as a personal attack. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on a policy issue rather than personal characteristics. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement could promote understanding and empathy by addressing concerns about the effectiveness of elected officials, though it may also be seen as stigmatizing older politicians.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing a systemic issue rather than launching personal attacks. However, it could be perceived as indirectly targeting specific individuals like Joe Biden. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to discuss a public policy issue responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.