Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement criticizes Kamala Harris's record as a prosecutor and mentions other politicians like Andrew Cuomo, suggesting a broader critique of certain political figures. The tone is critical and the intent appears to be to inform or persuade the audience about the perceived negative aspects of these politicians' records. The statement also includes a link to a website, which may provide further context or information.
- The statement uses strong language ('absolutely abhorrent') which could be seen as harmful, but it does not contain explicit threats or incitements to violence. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use strong, potentially dignity-compromising language. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is primarily critical. Violation. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments; it focuses on the public records of the politicians. Adherence. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to critique public figures, which is a responsible use of free speech. Adherence. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.