Jill Stien

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -97

The statement is highly critical of Kamala Harris and the Democratic Party, using strong language to dissuade people from voting for her. It accuses her of supporting genocide, moving the Democratic Party to the right, and opposing the progressive agenda. The tone is confrontational and accusatory, aiming to influence public opinion against Kamala Harris and neoliberal policies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses inflammatory language such as 'voting for genocide,' which can be harmful and misleading. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, particularly Kamala Harris, by making severe accusations without substantiated evidence. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it fosters division and hostility. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against Kamala Harris and the Democratic Party. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion but does so in a way that is divisive and potentially harmful to societal discourse. [-2]