Jill Stien

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -97

The statement and accompanying images engage in public discourse by addressing the issue of the federal minimum wage and the political actions (or inactions) of the Biden/Harris administration. The tone is critical, suggesting that the administration had the power to increase the minimum wage but chose not to do so. The images provide context and support for the argument, highlighting the administration's stance and the procedural aspects involved.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but criticizes political actions, which is a common aspect of public discourse.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on political actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by providing context and information about the political process and the administration's actions. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of the administration's actions without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to address a significant societal issue, advocating for a higher minimum wage. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses its platform responsibly to discuss a public issue. [+1]