Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement addresses a public issue, specifically the behavior of politicians and the nature of protests related to a serious conflict, which qualifies it as public discourse. The tone is critical and somewhat inflammatory, using charged language like 'corporate war-monger club' and 'bloody genocide.' The intent appears to be to criticize politicians and defend certain forms of protest, while acknowledging that some actions by protesters may be seen as detestable.
- The statement uses strong, potentially harmful language ('corporate war-monger club'), which could be seen as doing harm with words. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the language used is harsh and could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against politicians. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be considered responsible or with integrity due to its inflammatory language. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.