Reposted by Ilhan Omar
The statement and the conversation it refers to constitute public discourse as they engage with a significant public issue—reproductive healthcare and potential federal responses to it. The tone is one of shock and urgency, aiming to draw attention to a controversial topic.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to a polarized environment. It neither significantly upholds nor violates this principle.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It adheres to this principle. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on generating outrage. It slightly violates this principle. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is more of a call to action based on a leak, which could be seen as a personal attack. It slightly violates this principle. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to bring attention to a public issue but does so in a way that may not be entirely responsible, given the potential for increased polarization. It slightly violates this principle. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.