Jill Stien

Rank 36 of 47
|
Score -70

The statement is a critical commentary on Kamala Harris's stance on Israel and Palestine, engaging with public issues related to international law, human rights, and political allegiance. The tone is accusatory and impassioned, aiming to challenge and provoke discussion on a contentious geopolitical issue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful, particularly the phrase 'Israeli propaganda talking points,' which may incite hostility rather than constructive dialogue. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech directly, but the accusatory tone could be seen as disrespectful to Kamala Harris and others who hold different views. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on taking a strong stance against a perceived injustice. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against Kamala Harris. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be considered responsible or with integrity, given its accusatory and divisive tone. [-1]