The statement and accompanying image address a significant public issue, namely the political actions and policies of a prominent political figure, as well as the response of members of Congress. The tone is highly critical and accusatory, using strong language to express disapproval and demand justice. The statement also highlights participation in a protest, indicating active engagement in civic dialogue.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement uses strong language ('genocidal monster') which could be seen as harmful and inflammatory, potentially inciting further division rather than constructive dialogue. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions.
 [-2]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement does not respect the dignity of the individual it criticizes, using derogatory language. This violates the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others.
 [-2]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy for the cause it supports, but the aggressive tone may undermine this goal. This partially aligns with the principle of promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion.
 [+1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for personal attacks. This violates the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue without personal attacks.
 [-2]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement uses the platform to bring attention to a significant issue, which aligns with the principle of using influence for the betterment of society.
 [+2]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or with integrity, given the inflammatory language. This partially aligns with the principle of upholding free speech responsibly.
 [+1]