Andrew Yang

The statement 'JD Vance only raised the stakes of the election.' along with the linked blog post and the context of the conversation about JD Vance being selected as Donald Trump's running mate, constitutes public discourse. It engages with a public issue, specifically the political landscape and election dynamics.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm directly. It is a neutral observation about the impact of JD Vance's selection on the election stakes. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more of a factual observation.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is focused on the political implications rather than personal attributes. [+1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses the platform to discuss a significant political event, which can be seen as contributing to public awareness and dialogue. [+1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly. It does not spread misinformation or engage in harmful rhetoric. [+1]