Rashida Tlaib

Rank 4 of 47
|
Score 366

The statement 'Bombing a school is a war crime under international humanitarian law. Period.' is a direct response to a news report about an Israeli airstrike hitting a school in Gaza. The tone is assertive and unequivocal, aiming to highlight the gravity of the situation and the legal implications under international humanitarian law.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by condemning an act that is widely recognized as harmful and illegal under international law. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on the act itself rather than targeting individuals or groups with hate speech or harassment. [+2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by drawing attention to the severity of bombing a school, which is a universally condemned act. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments; it focuses on the act and its legal implications. [+2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to highlight a serious issue, thereby contributing to the betterment of society by advocating for adherence to international humanitarian law. [+2]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to address a significant public issue with integrity. [+2]