Jill Stien

The statement 'Period. Full stop.' in the context of the conversation about the Green Party and AIPAC influence is a definitive and emphatic assertion. It suggests a strong stance against AIPAC influence, implying that the absence of such influence is a primary reason for supporting the Green Party. The tone is assertive and final, leaving no room for further discussion or debate on the matter.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm, but its assertive and final nature could potentially shut down further dialogue, which might be seen as indirectly harmful to constructive discourse. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy of individuals but targets an organization (AIPAC) in a critical manner. It does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the critical nature could be seen as lacking respect for differing viewpoints. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it takes a firm stance without room for discussion, which can hinder mutual understanding. [-2]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is a final assertion that does not invite further discussion or consideration of opposing views. [-2]