Jill Stien

Rank 28 of 47
|
Score 22

The statement and accompanying image constitute public discourse as they engage with a significant political issue, calling for the resignation and surrender of a prominent political figure. The tone is assertive and accusatory, demanding action and justice.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to address perceived injustices, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. However, the accusatory tone and demand for resignation and surrender could be seen as harmful to the individual targeted.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of the individual it targets, as it publicly demands their resignation and surrender, which can be seen as a form of public shaming. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes a specific viewpoint and calls for action, but it does not foster understanding, empathy, or compassion towards the individual it targets. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead, it makes a direct demand and labels the individual as a war criminal, which can be seen as a personal attack. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to influence public opinion and calls for action, which can be seen as using influence for societal change. However, the approach may be polarizing and not necessarily for the betterment of society. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be considered inflammatory and not entirely responsible or with integrity. [-1]