In reply to:
Girl Wonder
@yo_wonderful
·
110d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
110d
The statement by JD Vance, as reported by AP News, constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue concerning the qualifications and stakes of political leaders. The tone is critical and raises a question about the suitability of certain individuals to lead the country based on their personal circumstances.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as divisive by questioning the legitimacy of certain individuals based on their personal circumstances. This could indirectly cause harm by fostering exclusionary attitudes. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the dignity of individuals without children, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it creates a division based on personal circumstances. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It raises a question that could be seen as a personal attack on individuals without children, rather than addressing their policies or actions. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that could be seen as irresponsible by questioning the legitimacy of individuals based on personal circumstances rather than their qualifications or actions. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.